Psychodynamic Versus Other Perspectives
Psychodynamic
Versus Other Perspectives
Different theoretical perspectives play a
unique role in presenting unique orientations as well as views towards
understanding the causes as well as the best treatment approaches for abnormal
psychology. In this given paper, each of
these viewpoints are evaluated and compared so that their success can be
assessed. A total of six theoretical perspectives (biological, behavioral, cognitive,
humanistic, sociocultural, and biopsychosocial) are compared to the
psychodynamic perspective to ascertain the approach that contributes the most
towards enhanced treatment and successful understanding of abnormal psychology.
Research suggests that abnormal psychology deals with unusual patterns of
behaviors, emotions, as well as thoughts that precipitate mental disorders and
the role that theoretical perspectives play should be towards enhanced
treatment and discerning of causes.
Developed by Sigmund Freud, the psychodynamic
theory argues that patterns of behaviors, emotions, as well as thoughts are
caused by conflicting unconscious urges with conscious desires (Conklin 32).
Thus, the three main terms that are considered by the theory are conscious desires, unconscious urges, and
conflict. As a result, resultant
mental illnesses develop when earlier conflicts and adversities are repressed
(Conklin 71). Thus, the best treatment (according to the theory) is to subject
patients with mental illnesses to therapy. During such sessions, childhood
issues as well as dreams are addressed.
On the other hand, the biological approach is
a perspective that focuses on the functioning of nervous system at the
structural as well as cellular levels (Baglivio
et al., 378). Thus, the three mains terms that are emphasized by this approach
are nervous system, structural as
well as cellular. First developed by
Hippocrates and his associates between 450 and 350 BC, the theory explains that
medical issues bring about underlying mental illnesses (Baglivio et al., 381). Therefore, the best treatment measures
would be to treat damage to the nervous system that may be in the form of
lesions or chemical imbalance.
The behavioral approach was developed by psychologists
James Watson and B. F. Skinner (Walker 31). They developed the theory which
argues that mental illnesses might be caused by the behaviors which are learned
through a complex system characterized by rewards and punishments. Three terms
that best define this approach are rewards,
complex system of learning, and
punishments (Walker 45). As a result, this approach suggests that the best
treatment should focus on identifying the individual behaviors that are
abnormal and changing them through a system of rewards and punishments.
Developed by Beck and Ellis, the cognitive
theory is a perspective that explains abnormal behavior results from the
thought process of a patient (Beck 777). Thus, maladaptive thought patterns
encourage mental illnesses as they define the thought process and as well as
perceptions (Beck 781). Key terms with the perspective are maladaptive thought patterns, processes, and perceptions. Treatment to mental illness due to abnormal psychology
would be changing the thought patterns.
Carl Rogers (1951) and Abraham Maslow (1968)
contributed to the formulation of the humanistic approach and they argued that abnormality
is due to the inability to exercise authenticity (Nizette
& Barkway, 105). Meeting people’s social and physical needs is the
only means to attain authenticity. Thus, critical terms in this theory are physical needs, social needs, and authenticity. Mental illnesses develop
as people are unable to pursue their deepest and truest passions. Treatment, as
proposed by the theory, focuses on encouraging people to discern their passion
and achieving them as well.
The sociocultural theory was developed by Lev
Semyonovich Vygotsky and looks at mental illnesses to be caused by their
experiences, influences, as well as culture (Tupper 28). Therefore, key terms
in the theory are culture, influences,
and experiences. Treatment would be characterized
by integrating diverse and informed cultural and social norms to the
therapeutic initiatives being undertaken.
Lastly, there is the biopsychosocial approach
that was developed by George L. Engel and Jon Romano of Rochester. It focuses
on thoughts, feelings, and personal history as the key aspects in
development of mental issues (Snodgrass 439). As a more holistic approach, it
integrates biological, psychological, and social factors in the development of
mental illnesses. Thus, the best treatment would be to consider the complex
interactions of these three dynamics (Snodgrass 442). Out of all the
perspectives, it is the most effective in understanding and treatment of abnormal
psychology since it encompasses biological, psychological, and social factors
in one spectrum for better healthcare outcomes.
Works Cited
Baglivio, Michael T., et al.
"Effortful control, negative emotionality, and juvenile recidivism: An
empirical test of DeLisi and Vaughn’s temperament-based theory of antisocial
behavior." The Journal of
Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology27.3 (2016): 376-403.
Beck, Aaron T.
"Cognitive therapy: nature and relation to behavior therapy–republished
article." Behavior
therapy 47.6 (2016): 776-784.
Conklin, Edmund Smith. Revival: Principles of Abnormal
Psychology (1928). Routledge, 2018.
Lantolf, James P., Matthew
E. Poehner, and Merrill Swain, eds. The
Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development.
Routledge, 2018.
Nizette, Debra, and Patricia
Barkway. "Mental Health Theory and Influence Across the Lifespan." Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
in the Uk, E-Book (2020):
105.
Snodgrass, S. Robert.
"Stanley Cobb, the Rockefeller Foundation and the evolution of American
psychiatry." History of
psychiatry 29.4 (2018):
438-455.
TUPPER, DAVID E.
"Vygotsky, Luria, and the Cultural-Historical Approach to Cognitive
Psychology and Neuropsychology." Clinical
Cultural Neuroscience: An Integrative Approach to Cross-Cultural
Neuropsychology(2019): 32.
Walker, Stephen. Learning theory and behaviour
modification. Routledge, 2017.
Comments
Post a Comment